– COLUMN –
A novel Chinese avian virus could give the mRNA sequence for a vaccine. A “disruptive” event is the only way to impress upon people the urgency of radically speeding up vaccine production. “Misinformation” about pandemics must be more combatted. All suggested in 2019.
Was the Covid-19 plandemic a global conspiracy? We certainly do not know for sure, and we may never know for sure. As a confirmed cynic, it has always been my instinct to laugh at the notion of large-scale conspiracy, unless it is undeniably obvious. My research projects over the past year have started to raise serious questions in my mind, however. But why state my opinion? Here are some facts, including some exclusive details, which no one seems to be reporting on.
At an Oct. 2019 summit and at Event 201 (hosted that same month), experts including Dr. Fauci, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, the Gates Foundation, (now) Biden’s Director of Natl. Intelligence, and the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) virologist George Gao variously demanded or endorsed much faster timelines for vaccines, more aggressive combat of “misinformation” related to pandemics, a “disruptive” approach to changing the institutional architecture surrounding vaccines, and mRNA vaccines based potentially on a novel Chinese virus. Was there a conspiracy? Were there simply startling coincidences? There are at least questions we need to be asking. I will present you the little-known facts, and let you decide.
A recently unearthed C-SPAN video of the Milken Institute summit from late 2019 reveals Dr. Fauci and several other experts discussing “how to enforce Universal Flu Vaccination.” They want to use “global collaboration” to speed up vaccine production radically and they say only in a crisis do people take such matters seriously—they need something “disruptive.”
One expert suggested a possible “avian flu” from China that could lead to the creation of rapidly produced mRNA (i.e. gene therapy) vaccines. These are just a few short quotes from several of the “experts” at the summit (emphasis added):
“Michael Specter: Why don’t we blow the system up?. . .
Fauci: In order to make the transition from getting out of the tried-and-true egg growing. . .You have to prove that this works and then you’ve got to go through all of the clinical trials. . .That alone, if it works perfectly, it’s going to take a decade.
Rick Bright: There might be a need or even an urgent call for an entity of excitement out there that’s completely disruptive, that’s not beholden to bureaucratic strings and processes.
Fauci: So we really do have a problem of how the world perceives influenza and it’s going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say, I don’t care what your perception is, we’re going to address the problem in a disruptive and in an iterative way because [you do] need both.
Bright: But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from that… to a number of regional centers if not local, if not even in your home at some point, and print those vaccines on a patch of self-administer.”
Did these experts know something we didn’t? At any rate, it seems just a little strange that Fauci was calling for change from within, “disruptive” change, and that Bright was talking about using mRNA sequences from a novel Chinese avian virus as the basis for rush-produced vaccines (and that is exactly what Bright did later call for—vaccines created very quickly, mRNA-based, even if they may be mediocre at first).
The Milken experts bemoaned the lack of a “sense of urgency” and funding for flu vaccines (Fauci said “incentive” was needed), and suggested “global collaboration” as a solution, to which “institutional architecture” was an impediment. One summit participant sighed that if medical experts “do your job well,” everyone is happy.
As a point of additional interest, Dr. Rick Bright was ousted from his position as director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority by Trump after Bright attempted to undermine or contradict Trump’s endorsement of hydroxychloroquine (which is, in fact, highly effective against Covid). A bitter Bright later hired two leftist lawyers, including the lawyer (Debra Katz) of the questionable sexual accuser against Justice Brett Kavanaugh, to represent him in a “whistleblower complaint.” Bright previously worked for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Something else was happening in Oct. 2019 besides the Milken Institute summit, however. “The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY.” Conclusions in the “joint call to action” from the event, which imagined a “SARS”-like virus, included a recommendation to plan for “surge” vaccine manufacture and another recommendation to control “misinformation” better. “Governments should provide more resources and support for the development and surge manufacturing of vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics that will be needed,” is the direct quote from Johns Hopkins’ own (annual) report on Event 201 (emphasis added); the report adds (emphasis added), “Governments and the private sector should assign a greater priority to developing methods to combat misinformation and disinformation.” Remember, this was only a few months before Covid-19 (a SARS virus) began taking over the world.
Furthermore, George Gao, head of the Chinese CDC (CCDC), was at Event 201 as an expert. The CCDC is a governmental agency, and therefore under the direct control of the oppressive Chinese Communist Party. The CCDC oversees the biosafety laboratory (BL) system in China, and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, from which Covid-19 escaped, is a BL. Furthermore, originally two laboratories were being scrutinized connected to the origin of Covid-19, and the second lab was a CCDC BL, Wuhan branch. Gao, by the way, is in fact a virologist.
Interestingly, another expert at Event 201 was Avril Haines, who is currently serving as Biden’s Director of National Intelligence. Haines had served as Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Legal Adviser to the National Security Council under Obama and, at the time of Event 201, was a Senior Fellow at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
A Johns Hopkins project team had already made the following recommendations in April 2019:
- “Prioritize platform vaccine technology based on the ability to develop a vaccine candidate very rapidly and commence Phase I trials earlier than with traditional candidates.”
- “Promote mRNA-based vaccine techniques that appear particularly promising in terms of ease of manufacture, adaptability to various targets, and biological delivery.”
- “Incentivize platform vaccine technologies for emerging infectious disease medical countermeasures with dedicated funding.”
If you would like more specific evidence showing either how remunerative the Covid-19 plandemic was for the major players at Event 201, or how they are connected in suspicious ways to the pandemic’s origins and Covid vaccines:
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security is the author of the 2017 study which predicted a novel coronavirus pandemic, during which pandemic death numbers would be inflated, a rush-produced vaccine would have terrible side effects, the government would control narratives on social media, and other shocking similarities to the real Covid pandemic (as explained in detail in my two-part exposé for the Rogue Review).
Note that, at Event 201, “misinformation” control and surge-produced vaccines were touted. As I said above, in April 2019, Johns Hopkins pushed for funding with the vision of rush-produced mRNA vaccines. In May 2021, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security was “awarded a $400,000 USD grant from The Rockefeller Foundation to identify and showcase successful country responses to Covid-19.” Incidentally, Rick Bright (see above on Milken Institute Summit) is the Senior Vice President of Pandemic Prevention and Response for The Rockefeller Foundation. Johns Hopkins has therefore long been invested in the prediction of a global SARS pandemic and has financially benefited from the occurrence of this one.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has owned stock in Johnson and Johnson and Pfizer since 2002. In 2017, the Gates Foundation awarded Pfizer over $17 million connected to a “streptococcus (GBS) vaccine.” The Gates Foundation co-founded and continues to fund Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), which focuses largely on vaccines. CEPI is tied to the CCDC and thus the Wuhan lab through the CCDC employee, Dong Xiaoping, who is a voting member on their Scientific Advisory Board.
CEPI now is planning on a budget of billions of dollars, including $1 billion focused on Covid, to achieve a timeline of new vaccines every 100 days (vaccines usually take minimum of 5 to 10 years, partly to determine safety and efficacy). Rick Bright—yes, him again—was reportedly a “key advisor” in “the development of the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI).” Gates Foundation Senior Advisor and former CEO Desmond-Hellmann is on Pfizer’s Board of Directors. The Gates Foundation thus has a vested interest financially and ideologically in the Covid vaccines and vaccine companies.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) now touts the “Great Reset” to remake the world post-Covid. “There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis,” says The Great Reset webpage.
Hmm, globalist elites need to take over the world because of the “direct consequences” of the plandemic. . . The Great Reset has ties to the United Nations (UN) as well. “The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and financial to energy and education – are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives, livelihoods and the planet. . .this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”
Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract,” says the Great Reset webpage further (emphasis added). Also, CEPI (see above) was founded at WEF in Davos. WEF sees the Covid pandemic as a chance to redo the world woke fashion.
Dr. Fauci and NIH colleagues were using US money to fund a Chinese (Wuhan) lab that did gain-of-function research, the lab out of which Covid-19 escaped. Fauci has been one of the most powerful men in the world since the plandemic began, and Francis Collins, the NIH head who was, perhaps, more directly responsible for funding the Wuhan lab (and who admitted they had had no control over what the Wuhan lab did with the money), also has had immense power.
When have Big Pharma and medical experts had so much control and money? And Fauci explicitly said he wanted something “disruptive” to happen to show people how urgently they needed funding for rush-produced vaccines, not long before the plandemic began (started by the lab scientists Fauci was notably communicating with—or rather, speaking at conferences with).
Event 201. . .the Milken Institute Summit. . .the Great Reset. . .it all ties together. Too well. Maybe it is time that we the American people, and our elected officials, began asking important questions about these organizations, events, and “experts” to get at the root of what really caused the disruptive world makeover of the Covid-19 plandemic.